hmm, on Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 05:34:49PM -0500, Nick Holland said that > Rene Rivera wrote: > > Hannah Schroeter wrote: > ... > >> Deciding for *any* resolution is *bad* "design". > > > > The current openbsd.org doesn't "work" at 640x480... Does that make it a > > bad design? And hence should be considered a bug to be fixed by a new > > design?
it doesn't even work at 800x600 without making the fonts smaller. yes it is bad design. > Adding CSS to the OpenBSD website "because it's cool" is pure bullshit, > but your claim (if true) is not. <sigh> opposing css "because it's cool" isn't very professional either. sorry Nick, i don't agree with you on this one. welcome to the 21st century of web pages. didn't keep telnetd, why not step up the new (actually quite old) web standard? -f -- Introibo ad altare Dei.