Quartz wrote: > > On a more serious note, I don't see how one can actually buy faster > > single-core performance for this purpose. If the question was more > > detailed, describing specific models of machines, we'd be able to > > show it makes no financial sense. The cheapest stuff is good enough. > > As I said before, I think information is getting lost here in the > discussion. The issue is we need something that fits within certain > restrictive thermal/size/power/noise limits; these are all fanless > setups and some might even be battery powered. The sort of questions I'm > facing are like do we go for a single core Celeron or a multicore Atom > or what. I understand that the gross performance of a top of the line > Xeon or whatever will make this issue moot, but we can't afford > something like that for this project.
Is it not possible to buy two or three representative models and test them to find out which of celeron, atom, or amd is fastest?
