> On 01/19/18 01:12, Theo de Raadt wrote: > >> FWIW, the permission I seek is from my Legal department. > > > > That maybe your job but it isn't the project's job. > > > Enough is enough. That sentence above makes it clear who is getting > > paid for satisfying those requirements: You. > > Huh, where did he imply otherwise? I don't think I saw Kent make a > single claim about what the project _ought_ to do, or have done.
Oh, cut your crap. There is no question who would be capable of doing that work and having it count. His legal isn't going to sign off on someone like Lari doing the work, so the implication is he wanted *US TO DO IT* And we don't. And he should know better (1) due to the gigantic NO WARRANTY on 99% of the files. (2) the realizion that we provide a vast body for code for free His expectation is balony. This isn't a corporation. Your disagreement isn't worth a penny. You have no stake in the work. It is obvious you just want to be a yappy mouth.
