"Jake D. Parsons" writes: > You seem to be railing against some perceived notion of injustice in
Injustice? No. Irrelevence. > some perceived notion utopia. What is the point and agenda here? Why do Utopia? Have you ever even *run* a computer system? My point is that I'm tired of the excessive waste and shere incompetence caused by bickering between people unwilling to humble themselves enough to admit to their shared experiences and common goals. How did we *ever* let the emperor's new server come to pass? Although it does pay well. > different technologies? Because it is their choice and considerations of > what would work best for them. I' am glad there is so many choices. It This sentence no verb. If I assume 'exist' it can only imply that you misunderstand. Quelle surprise. The problem is not different technologies; competition builds strength. The problem is identical bikesheds painted different colours; competition can also end in a premature death of misdirected talent. Ingo, although I disagree with the finer points of his argument, is the only person in this thread yet to talk sense. There's _so much_ posturing. And to what purpose? > means the riff raff can float their raft over there and I can float my Always it is "they" who are the riff-raff. Such arrogance. > raft over here. And yet they're still rafts, while we fool ourselves that we man a battleship. Enjoy your lawyer-enriching disaster while you are ground into irrelevance beneath a mountain of impotence and wasted effort. Matthew
