Marc Espie <es...@nerim.net> wrote: > All the horrors stories I've seen in this discussion are related > to people trusting it blindly/automatically.
But why wouldn't people trust it? All the documentation claims it produces a list of files that is obsolete. It says those files are obsolete & unused -- with such authority! Nowhere does it say "Oh, but these obsolete files may still be used" Why is it blind for people to run rm? Are they stupidly making assumptions based upon the documentation?
