On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 10:15:06PM +0200, Tobias Weisserth wrote:
> > This is just the most idiotic thing I've ever heard. You are creating
> > a whole bunch of unneccessary problems for yourself.
>
> It's pretty obvious he's trying to hide his true identity because of these
> mp3
> activities on the Internet. If he's that paranoid about his probably illegal
> activities I don't understand why he talks about them in detail on a public
> mailing list... :-)
Illegal activities? Naw man! I just like moving like a Mack truck. See,
I'm already gone! Once I was upset that they didn't give everyone static
IP's, and then I thought about the words Vint Cerf said, and I got
enlightened. Anonymity rocks when you're taking charge of it. If you
linger around for 20 hours a day someone can track you and the dynamic IP
is useless. So I'm turning it around, into the intended direction. And I
know I'm on the right path.
There is a lot of things you see when you push the technology to the limits,
like why does pppoe(4) take 6 seconds to authenticate you over Ethernet when
you cycle the pppoeX interface? Obviously streamlining can be done to push
this down below a second. Somewhere there is a loop too many in the sppp or
pppoe code or a timeout too long.
Anyhow per day I see around 1440 IP's, I know my connecting netblock.. do you
know yours?
$ grep "new ip for now" /var/log/all | awk '{print $NF}' | sort -u | wc -l
17991
$
There's your odds if you want to find me at any minute. And if you scan
how do you know that I won't disconnect before the scan reaches me and re-
appear to an IP that the scan already passed? Linear portscanning won't
work. You may as well send a random packet and hope it comes across my
ways.
> cheers,
> Tobias
So you can't help me with a useful answer either? Sad.
-p
--
Here my ticker tape .signature #### My name is Peter Philipp #### lynx -dump
"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pufferfish&oldid=20768394"; | sed -n
131,136p #### So long and thanks for all the fish!!!
