Lars Hansson wrote: > Han Boetes wrote: > > Of course you wouldn't bother to read this article: > > > > http://www.dwheeler.com/blog/2006/09/01/#gpl-bsd > > > > Since it's polite, to point and factual. > > Yes, it's so factual that he fail to mention/understand that the > BSD license *is* GPL compatible.
So? > The reasoning pretty much goes: > > * Linux rocketed to fame because of the GPL (a statement that is > in itself highly questionable) > * It's an important advantage to use GPL-compatible licences (an > opinion, not a fact) > * The BSD license has hurt the BSD projects because its not GPL- > compatible (which it IS) > > Congratulations, your reasoning is self-contradicting. You really should read it again, you really misread it. # Han
