> Is there anyone here who actually proposes to prevent users from
> running non-free software? Not I. I think that software is
> unethical, and I refuse to install it, or suggest it to anyone. But I
> have not proposed that systems actually block its installation.
Yet you were in an interview where you argued against using OpenBSD,
because it permits users to run non-free software.
Your argument was that OpenBSD contains non-free parts in it's
ports tree.
This has been proven to be false.
Here, go have a look
ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/poerts.tar.gz
It's just an entirely free scaffold of Makefiles and little patches.
Nothing more. It is 100% source, and it is 100% free.
If you are going to go around making pronouncements from your pulpit,
you might want to go educate yourself.
But once again, you failed to educate yourself before you opened your
big fat mouth on a talk show and stated utterly uneducated and false
statements . You have had ample opportunity to say "I was wrong", yet
you have not done so yet.
You keep argueing, and that is because you are a coward.
