El sC!b, 15-12-2007 a las 09:57 -0700, Jack J. Woehr escribiC3:

> I profoundly respect both of you and know you both f2f.  Richard
> has been my house guest twice. You're both tyrannical, bratty
> absolute tyrants, the difference being Richard is passive-aggressive
> and Theo is aggressive-aggressive.

I see other differences:

Theo write code, see and supervise commits to the OpenBSD tree, fight
whit hardware manufacturers directly, and have puntual and clear
fundamentals, opinions and statements.

Richard promote non clear software, linked to non clear libraries, that
manage non clear formats even on non clear platforms, on unreadable tons
of code very difficult to audit and defend.

Bot of them use to cause furor or flames when speak. Could be because of
the people predisposition, or ignorance or intelligence. But there are
other differences:

While one is making (really free) commits to a cvs, the other is walking
without clothes on your non-free house, non-free flying and eating your
non-free food, to go to speak through proprietary microphones to people
that use windows PDAs, and tell a story that "may be wrong, or my be ok,
because it is my story or may don't be, blabla"

While one is going to try to convince his fable, legend, about a kernel
that wasn't GNUable but it was the only recomendable option, flaming on
list, papers, interviews, talks and songs, the other is going to hack on
a really recomendable system, bit by bit, line by line, function by
function...

While one is wrong, confusing, manipulating, saying things are not true
or not reality, or not the full picture of a reality, where he is called
or where he isn't called, and touching eggs, so that people do that he
(from his memory and oxidized vision of the 90's linux) says. The other
is usually typing things useful and whit quality, far from media
movements, masses, crowds, shit and mediocrity (until someone comes
touching eggs)

So yes... on this situation one is passive-aggressive (liar, hypocrite
and vague) ant the other is aggressive-aggressive (worker, accurate,
consistent and informed). You are true.

Best regards.

Reply via email to