On Feb 13, 2008 8:23 PM, Matthew Weigel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > bofh wrote: > > > 2) lack of tuits to take on a major change for not really any major > > perceived gains: this is not an itch any of the developers currently > have. > > ...except the developers (outside OpenBSD) who developed the patch.
Not sure what you mean. Surely I don't have to point out to you that if this goes in, it'll go into base, which means this will be part of the core of openbsd. Why would _I_ as a user want the developers to take this code lightly? Why would they as the developer want to take the code in lightly? Which comes back to - it's not an itch any one of the developers have, and they don't have the tuits to do it. Or are you suggesting they should take in code any tom, dick or harry wrote? -- http://www.glumbert.com/media/shift http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGvHNNOLnCk "This officer's men seem to follow him merely out of idle curiosity." -- Sandhurst officer cadet evaluation. "Securing an environment of Windows platforms from abuse - external or internal - is akin to trying to install sprinklers in a fireworks factory where smoking on the job is permitted." -- Gene Spafford learn french: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1G-3laJJP0&feature=related
