On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Bret S. Lambert <bret.lamb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 07:04:28PM +0200, RedShift wrote: >> Just because they (the openbsd team) give it away for free, people aren't allowed to voice their opinions on it? OpenBSD has its shortcomings, you cannot deny that, and people will always complain about those. Saying "write it yourself" is avoiding responsibility. But they have the right to avoid their responsibility because they gave it away for free. > > What responsibility? To make sure gifts of labor are up to your exacting > standards?
The responsibility is actually on the people making demands to know what the project is all about before spouting out. Then, they would have known that there is no "openbsd non-profit" -- http://www.glumbert.com/media/shift http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGvHNNOLnCk "This officer's men seem to follow him merely out of idle curiosity." -- Sandhurst officer cadet evaluation. "Securing an environment of Windows platforms from abuse - external or internal - is akin to trying to install sprinklers in a fireworks factory where smoking on the job is permitted." -- Gene Spafford learn french: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1G-3laJJP0&feature=related
