I'm just not sure how you managed to inteprete openbsd to be a democracy though. Was there a flag on the front lawn saying this here is a democratic country?
Shouldn't people who are interested in governance, like, you know, go find out what the current governance structure is, before speaking out of their as, or defend those who do? Read up on how openbsd got started. Theo was kicked out because netbsd considered him too bothersome to deal with, as he would rip out shitty code. I wonder why openbsd only zero out of the box network vulnerabilities for the longest time... Maybe because someone has the balls to call bad code, bad code. And no documentation is considered a bug - we've all seen Theo rip code out when he gets fed up of no docs. How is any of these considered a "democracy"? At best, this is feudalism, where we have a king, a few trusted high level people, more lower level people, and the rest of us are peons. On 4/3/09, Luis F Urrea <lfur...@gmail.com> wrote: > Maybe Redshift's logic is that democratic mechanisms enable the community to > adapt as members learn how to interpret leadership and authority. > > Suppressing such mechanisms may not be digestible enough up front. And I > don't know if I am the only one, but I sense a smell of indigestion in the > air. > > -- Sent from my mobile device http://www.glumbert.com/media/shift http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGvHNNOLnCk "This officer's men seem to follow him merely out of idle curiosity." -- Sandhurst officer cadet evaluation. "Securing an environment of Windows platforms from abuse - external or internal - is akin to trying to install sprinklers in a fireworks factory where smoking on the job is permitted." -- Gene Spafford learn french: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1G-3laJJP0&feature=related
