On Thu, 21 May 2009, Jason Dixon wrote:
No offense, but that's a terrible design. Get yourself two inexpensive
systems (5501's are ok) and run them in a failover configuration. You
have redundancy and the flexiblity to alternate between releases.
Without the headache of middleware patches, an unsupported
configuration, etc.
--
Jason Dixon
DixonGroup Consulting
http://www.dixongroup.net/
Jason has a very valid point, if you are making money from this endeavor
following the KISS principle is the path of least resistance. Labor and
customer satisfaction have value. Since I don't know your business model
I can't tell if you can absorb the cost of an extra piece of hardware up
front. However I also can't tell if you can afford the extra cost of
labor to develop a system based upon the method you describe.
diana
