Guess that would help :-) mpeg2enc is what is running slower.
Here's the command line I used on the old one vs the new:
Old Command:
nice mpeg2enc -f 8 -b ${aRate} -V 230 -n n -s -a 2 -g 6 -G 18 -I 0 \
-r 24 -4 2 -2 2 -F 1 -p -v 0 -o ${aName}.m2v
New Command:
nice mpeg2enc -f 9 -b ${aRate} -V 230 -n n -s -a 2 -g 6 -G 18 -I 0 \
-r 24 -4 2 -2 2 -N 1.50 -Q 1.00 -v 0 -p -F 1 -o ${aName}.m2v
(Also tried -f 8 rather than -f 9).
I also noticed that using either -f8 or -f9 that something wasn't quite right with
some sort of timestamps. I did a 'mplayer test.m2v -ss 15:00' for example and that
really took me about 45 minutes into the movie (maybe a little further). This worked
when I encoded using the older version of mpeg2enc, doesn't with the new.
-- Ray
On 25 Aug 2003 07:34:07 +0200
Ronald Bultje <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey Ray,
>
> On Sun, 2003-08-24 at 16:22, Ray Cole wrote:
> > I downloaded the source and built it. It seems to run about 4x slower than 1.6.1.
> > Any ideas?
>
> What runs 4 times slower? Recording? MPEG encoding? Transcoding?
> Compiling?
>
> Ronald
>
> --
> Ronald Bultje <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines
at the same time. Free trial click here:http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/358/0
_______________________________________________
Mjpeg-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
