On Mon, 5 Nov 2007, Florin Andrei wrote: > I said this before - you guys should make releases way more often. Very
Of what? Broken software? No sense doing a release for the last year or whatever since it was broken. And now it _may_ be fixed and it's time for testing, not a release. > few people are going to track the CVS. Then I guess they're not the folks that should be testing unreleased and possibly buggy software, right? That's more of a developer (or development assisting) activity and that's what CVS is for. A release means that testing has been done . Testing is done out of cvs and not a release. > BTW, if I'm using 1.8.0 (default on Ubuntu), what do I get if I upgrade > to 1.9.0 RC1? The last known working encoder perhaps. I think it was after RC1 that things broke rather badly. Number of the filters were enhanced and I think the deinterlacing and denoising software was heavily revised. Now if you get the current CVS there's memory leaks fixed, further revisions / rewrites of the utils/filters. Build support for OSX 10.5 (done just a couple days ago ;)) and lots more - I don't keep a list in mind (that's what CVS is for ;)) Cheers, Steven ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Mjpeg-users mailing list Mjpeg-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users