Ahem, now if we have to take AOL users into account ... j/k. Actually, I don't see how cookies could be implemented; if the attacker rejects cookies, how are you going to do it? ... On Fri, 7 Apr 2000, Mark Imbriaco wrote: |What about folks who are behind proxies? (ie: AOL) It is not all that far |fetched to consider that an attacker and a legitimate user could both be |coming from AOL -- neiter is it farfetched to consider that they may be |assigned the same proxy server on the AOL network. | |There ARE workarounds to the issue, my point was simply that Vivek's |cookie idea is probably the best of the (admittedly numerous) bunch.
- THREE STRIKES... Gram, Jim
- Re: THREE STRIKES... Vivek Khera
- Re: THREE STRIKES... Gunther Birznieks
- Re: THREE STRIKES... Mark Imbriaco
- Re: THREE STRIKES... Gunther Birznieks
- Re: THREE STRIKES... Mark Imbriaco
- Re: THREE STRIKES... Gunther Birznieks
- Re: THREE STRIKES... Nicolas MONNET
- Re: THREE STRIKES... Mark Imbriaco
- Re: THREE STRIKES... Nicolas MONNET
- Re: THREE STRIKES... Gunther Birznieks
- Re: THREE STRIKES... Ask Bjoern Hansen
- Re: THREE STRIKES... Nicolas MONNET
- Re: THREE STRIKES... Jeffrey W. Baker
- Re: THREE STRIKES... Vivek Khera
- Re: THREE STRIKES... Ken Williams
- Re: THREE STRIKES... Eric L. Brine
- Re: THREE STRIKES... Ken Williams