On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 12:56:28AM -0500, Autarch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 23 May 2000, Marc Lehmann wrote:
>
> > stable (mod_perl really is very unstable for large applications). Apart
>
> Wow, I wish you'd warned me before I did several large applications using
> mod_perl. Fortunately, they haven't experienced any mod_perl related
Well, add XML::Parser, some large and twisted perl modules (like
XML::XSLT), do a lot of things dynamically (recompiling etc..) and apache
segfaults quite a lot, at random times, and even with some weird effects
(adding a comment makes httpd segfault, removing it and it works again).
Fortunately, once you found a source form where httpd starts up, mod_perl
seems to run fine for a long time.
I, too, used mod_perl for large projects _before_ and they ran stable (==
Apache::Registry). But the picture changes quite a bit when I started to
write my own mod_perl handler and to use the Apache::API extensively.
But this is very off-topic, at leats to my real concern (double parsing).
OTOH, the instability could very well be related to this as well.
--
-----==- |
----==-- _ |
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +--
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e|
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+
The choice of a GNU generation |
|