Stas Bekman wrote:
> I believe XML is a way too heavy for docs writing. Why one will want to
> get a messy source code, when you can get away with a minimalistic POD.
> Just look at the Guide's source code and look at the generated PDF --
> isn't it great? I love POD. And if you want more than POD provides, it
> takes secs to add the new functionality.
>
XML is probably a tad overboard but how about XHTML or at least looking
for a POD => XHTML for the future?
--
__________________________________________________________
Mr. Erich L. Markert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computer Learning Center TEL (914)422-4328
Pace University
1 Martine Ave
White Plains, New York 10606-1932
Those who do not understand Unix are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
-- Henry Spencer
- Re: Feature sets [was Re: Templating System] Gunther Birznieks
- Re: Feature sets [was Re: Templating System] Matt Sergeant
- Re: Feature sets [was Re: Templating System] Gunther Birznieks
- Re: Feature sets [was Re: Templating System] darren chamberlain
- Re: Feature sets [was Re: Templating System] Drew Taylor
- Re: Feature sets [was Re: Templating System] Stas Bekman
- Re: Feature sets [was Re: Templating System] Matt Sergeant
- [doc writing] (was Re: Feature sets [was Re: T... Stas Bekman
- Re: [doc writing] (was Re: Feature sets [was R... Matt Sergeant
- Re: [doc writing] (was Re: Feature sets [was R... Stas Bekman
- Re: Templating Feature sets Erich L. Markert
- Re: Templating Feature sets Matt Sergeant
- Re: Feature sets [was Re: Templating System] Drew Taylor
- Re: Feature sets [was Re: Templating System] Drew Taylor
- Re: Feature sets [was Re: Templating System] Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: Feature sets [was Re: Templating System] Gunther Birznieks
- Re: Feature sets [was Re: Templating System] Matt Sergeant
- Re: Feature sets [was Re: Templating System] Stas Bekman
- Re: Feature sets [was Re: Templating System] Stas Bekman
