Stas Bekman wrote: > I believe XML is a way too heavy for docs writing. Why one will want to > get a messy source code, when you can get away with a minimalistic POD. > Just look at the Guide's source code and look at the generated PDF -- > isn't it great? I love POD. And if you want more than POD provides, it > takes secs to add the new functionality. > XML is probably a tad overboard but how about XHTML or at least looking for a POD => XHTML for the future? -- __________________________________________________________ Mr. Erich L. Markert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Computer Learning Center TEL (914)422-4328 Pace University 1 Martine Ave White Plains, New York 10606-1932 Those who do not understand Unix are condemned to reinvent it, poorly. -- Henry Spencer
- Re: Feature sets [was Re: Templating System] Gunther Birznieks
- Re: Feature sets [was Re: Templating System] Matt Sergeant
- Re: Feature sets [was Re: Templating System] Gunther Birznieks
- Re: Feature sets [was Re: Templating System] darren chamberlain
- Re: Feature sets [was Re: Templating System] Drew Taylor
- Re: Feature sets [was Re: Templating System] Stas Bekman
- Re: Feature sets [was Re: Templating System] Matt Sergeant
- [doc writing] (was Re: Feature sets [was Re: T... Stas Bekman
- Re: [doc writing] (was Re: Feature sets [was R... Matt Sergeant
- Re: [doc writing] (was Re: Feature sets [was R... Stas Bekman
- Re: Templating Feature sets Erich L. Markert
- Re: Templating Feature sets Matt Sergeant
- Re: Feature sets [was Re: Templating System] Drew Taylor
- Re: Feature sets [was Re: Templating System] Drew Taylor
- Re: Feature sets [was Re: Templating System] Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: Feature sets [was Re: Templating System] Gunther Birznieks
- Re: Feature sets [was Re: Templating System] Matt Sergeant
- Re: Feature sets [was Re: Templating System] Stas Bekman
- Re: Feature sets [was Re: Templating System] Stas Bekman