On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Marinos J. Yannikos wrote: > Something else that seems to work well, although I can't really > explain it, is to disable keepalive support. For some reason, the > number of concurrent processes (for a single server setup) went from > 70-80 to approx. 20(!), without a noticeable drop in performance or > page impressions. KeepAlive will cause a connection to stay open (and a process to stay busy listening on it) for a period of time after the response is sent, even if nothing at all is happening on that connection. I think the default wait is 15 seconds. That can really add up fast when you have your MaxClients set at less than 100. KeepAlive is great on a proxy server or dedicated image server though. - Perrin
- Re: dynamic vs. mostly static data Marinos J. Yannikos
- Re: dynamic vs. mostly static data Perrin Harkins
- Re: dynamic vs. mostly static data Marinos J. Yannikos
- Re: dynamic vs. mostly static data Perrin Harkins
- Re: dynamic vs. mostly static data Marinos J. Yannikos
- Re: dynamic vs. mostly static da... Perrin Harkins
- Re: dynamic vs. mostly stati... David Hodgkinson
- Re: dynamic vs. mostly stati... Vivek Khera
- Re: dynamic vs. mostly stati... Marinos J. Yannikos
- RE: dynamic vs. mostly stati... Perrin Harkins
- RE: dynamic vs. mostly static data Jerrad Pierce
- Re: dynamic vs. mostly static data Carlos Ramirez
- RE: dynamic vs. mostly static data Peter Haworth
- RE: dynamic vs. mostly static data Jerrad Pierce
- [ADMIN] Keep those @$%#$ quotes down (was: dynami... Ask Bjoern Hansen
- Re: [ADMIN] Keep those @$%#$ quotes down (was... G.W. Haywood
- Re: [ADMIN] Keep those @$%#$ quotes down ... Gunther Birznieks
