> And indeed, they ought to die. Or be reimplemented. Or something, > but quite simply, don't use them. They'll break, they won't dwim, > and chances are they won't play nice with future/past versions of > Perl. Forget they even exist. Details? I'm using them with no problems in 5.005_03 (the real "last stable" version) with no problems. exists doesn't do what you think, that's the list of problems. -- John Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, CalvaEDI SA. Tel: +33-1-4313-3131 66 rue du Moulin de la Pointe, Fax: +33-1-4313-3139 75013 PARIS.
- pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure question Tom_Roche
- Re: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure question Matt Sergeant
- Re: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure question Robin Berjon
- RE: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure question John Hughes
- RE: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure questio... Matt Sergeant
- RE: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure que... John Hughes
- RE: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structur... Matt Sergeant
- RE: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structur... Robin Berjon
- RE: pseudo-hashes? was: Data stru... Matt Sergeant
- RE: pseudo-hashes? was: Data ... Robin Berjon
- Re: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure que... DeWitt Clinton
- [OT] XML::DOM Matt Sergeant
- Re: [OT] XML::DOM Paul J. Lucas
- Re: [OT] XML::DOM Matt Sergeant