> And indeed, they ought to die. Or be reimplemented. Or something,
> but quite simply, don't use them. They'll break, they won't dwim,
> and chances are they won't play nice with future/past versions of
> Perl. Forget they even exist.
Details?
I'm using them with no problems in 5.005_03 (the real "last stable"
version) with no problems.
exists doesn't do what you think, that's the list of problems.
--
John Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
CalvaEDI SA. Tel: +33-1-4313-3131
66 rue du Moulin de la Pointe, Fax: +33-1-4313-3139
75013 PARIS.
- pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure question Tom_Roche
- Re: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure question Matt Sergeant
- Re: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure question Robin Berjon
- RE: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure question John Hughes
- RE: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure questio... Matt Sergeant
- RE: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure que... John Hughes
- RE: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structur... Matt Sergeant
- RE: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structur... Robin Berjon
- RE: pseudo-hashes? was: Data stru... Matt Sergeant
- RE: pseudo-hashes? was: Data ... Robin Berjon
- Re: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure que... DeWitt Clinton
- [OT] XML::DOM Matt Sergeant
- Re: [OT] XML::DOM Paul J. Lucas
- Re: [OT] XML::DOM Matt Sergeant
