(exists doesn't work). > Neither does delete. Ok. But what should it do? What does it do for an array? > And overloading doesn't really work properly. Details? > And reloading modules with phashes doesn't work right. I steer clear of reloading, almost anything screws up. > And sub-hashes doesn't work right ($pseudo->{Hash}{SubHash}). Details? Works for me. > And so on... > All they do is hide a multitude of sins, for very little real world > gain. Try it - convert your app back to non-pseudo hashes and see what > performance you lose. I'm willing to bet its not a lot. Well, obviously. Hashes aren't slow. But they are *BIG*. -- John Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, CalvaEDI SA. Tel: +33-1-4313-3131 66 rue du Moulin de la Pointe, Fax: +33-1-4313-3139 75013 PARIS.
- pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure question Tom_Roche
- Re: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure question Matt Sergeant
- Re: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure question Robin Berjon
- RE: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure question John Hughes
- RE: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure questio... Matt Sergeant
- RE: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure que... John Hughes
- RE: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structur... Matt Sergeant
- RE: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structur... Robin Berjon
- RE: pseudo-hashes? was: Data stru... Matt Sergeant
- RE: pseudo-hashes? was: Data ... Robin Berjon
- Re: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure que... DeWitt Clinton
- [OT] XML::DOM Matt Sergeant
- Re: [OT] XML::DOM Paul J. Lucas
- Re: [OT] XML::DOM Matt Sergeant
- Re: [OT] XML::DOM Paul J. Lucas
- Re: [OT] XML::DOM Matt Sergeant