On Tue, 23 Jan 2001, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> But if performance is absolutely key in XML parsing/processing, then you
> really need to be looking towards Orchard, which we're co-developing with
> Ken MacLeod (author of the PerlSAX bindings and XML::Grove). Current tests
> reveal that its about 10 times faster at parsing than any Perl tree based
> parser ...
FYI, I recently released my of XML::Tree. My benchmark tests
against XML::Parser show mine to be 12 times faster. I wrote it
as sort of a challenge (internal to my company). The code is
based on my similar HTML::Tree.
A current caveat of mine is that it's not a compliant parser.
It doesn't currently handle Unicode, CDATA sections, ELEMENT
declarations, and probably some other stuff. But, if you're
processing straight-forward XML files, like config files, it
certainly works, and fast.
http://homepage.mac.com/pauljlucas/software/xml_tree/
- Paul
- Re: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure question Robin Berjon
- RE: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure question John Hughes
- RE: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure question Matt Sergeant
- RE: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure questio... John Hughes
- RE: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure que... Matt Sergeant
- RE: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure que... Robin Berjon
- RE: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structur... Matt Sergeant
- RE: pseudo-hashes? was: Data stru... Robin Berjon
- Re: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure questio... DeWitt Clinton
- [OT] XML::DOM Matt Sergeant
- Re: [OT] XML::DOM Paul J. Lucas
- Re: [OT] XML::DOM Matt Sergeant
- Re: [OT] XML::DOM Paul J. Lucas
- Re: [OT] XML::DOM Matt Sergeant
- Re: [OT] XML::DOM Paul J. Lucas
- Re: [OT] XML::DOM Jens-Uwe Mager
- Re: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure question Perrin Harkins
- Re: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure question Ken Williams
- RE: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure question John Hughes
- RE: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure question Matt Sergeant
- RE: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure question Perrin Harkins
