On Tue, 23 Jan 2001, Matt Sergeant wrote: > But if performance is absolutely key in XML parsing/processing, then you > really need to be looking towards Orchard, which we're co-developing with > Ken MacLeod (author of the PerlSAX bindings and XML::Grove). Current tests > reveal that its about 10 times faster at parsing than any Perl tree based > parser ... FYI, I recently released my of XML::Tree. My benchmark tests against XML::Parser show mine to be 12 times faster. I wrote it as sort of a challenge (internal to my company). The code is based on my similar HTML::Tree. A current caveat of mine is that it's not a compliant parser. It doesn't currently handle Unicode, CDATA sections, ELEMENT declarations, and probably some other stuff. But, if you're processing straight-forward XML files, like config files, it certainly works, and fast. http://homepage.mac.com/pauljlucas/software/xml_tree/ - Paul
- Re: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure question Robin Berjon
- RE: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure question John Hughes
- RE: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure question Matt Sergeant
- RE: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure questio... John Hughes
- RE: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure que... Matt Sergeant
- RE: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure que... Robin Berjon
- RE: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structur... Matt Sergeant
- RE: pseudo-hashes? was: Data stru... Robin Berjon
- Re: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure questio... DeWitt Clinton
- [OT] XML::DOM Matt Sergeant
- Re: [OT] XML::DOM Paul J. Lucas
- Re: [OT] XML::DOM Matt Sergeant
- Re: [OT] XML::DOM Paul J. Lucas
- Re: [OT] XML::DOM Matt Sergeant
- Re: [OT] XML::DOM Paul J. Lucas
- Re: [OT] XML::DOM Jens-Uwe Mager
- Re: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure question Perrin Harkins
- Re: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure question Ken Williams
- RE: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure question John Hughes
- RE: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure question Matt Sergeant
- RE: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure question Perrin Harkins