At 12:50 23/01/2001 +0000, Matt Sergeant wrote: >Thats only 5.6+ though. So its only useful for internal applications (if >at all). True, but we've been using 5.6 (built from AS source) in production for quite a while now very happily. Also, I'm seeing more and more customers having it or ready to upgrade. Doesn't make delete @array that much more useful, but there's hope. -- robin b. Designing pages in HTML is like having sex in a bathtub. If you don't know anything about sex, it won't do you any good to know a lot about bathtubs.
- pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure question Tom_Roche
- Re: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure question Matt Sergeant
- Re: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure question Robin Berjon
- RE: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure question John Hughes
- RE: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure questio... Matt Sergeant
- RE: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure que... John Hughes
- RE: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structur... Matt Sergeant
- RE: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structur... Robin Berjon
- RE: pseudo-hashes? was: Data stru... Matt Sergeant
- Re: pseudo-hashes? was: Data ... Robin Berjon
- Re: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure que... DeWitt Clinton
- [OT] XML::DOM Matt Sergeant
- Re: [OT] XML::DOM Paul J. Lucas
- Re: [OT] XML::DOM Matt Sergeant
- Re: [OT] XML::DOM Paul J. Lucas
- Re: [OT] XML::DOM Matt Sergeant
- Re: [OT] XML::DOM Paul J. Lucas
- Re: [OT] XML::DOM Jens-Uwe Mager
- Re: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure question Perrin Harkins
- Re: pseudo-hashes? was: Data structure question Ken Williams