He wants to check a 'handler' return value.
> shouldn't stacked handlers be the right solution here? are stacked auth
> handlers not allowed or something?
>
> aaron
>
> On Wed, 2002-02-13 at 09:02, darren chamberlain wrote:
> > Quoting Marcel Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12 Feb-02 16:15]:
> > > I don't get the point why it did not work the other way round,
> > > but now everything is just fine now :
> >
> > Make it a little more generic:
> >
> > package Apache::MultiAuthen;
> >
> > use strict;
> > use Apache::Constants qw(:common);
> >
> > sub handler {
> > my $r = shift;
> > my($res, $sent_pw) = $r->get_basic_auth_pw;
> > return $res if $res != OK;
> >
> > # Tweak this; unsure about dir_config returning an array
> > my @auth_modules = $r->dir_config("AuthModules");
> >
> > for my $am (@auth_modules) {
> > load($am);
> >
> > if ($@) {
> > $r->log("Error loading module '$am': $@");
> > next;
> > }
> >
> > my $handler = \&{"$am\::handler"};
> > if ($handler->($r) == OK) {
> > $r->log_reason("$am return OK");
> > return OK
> > }
> >
> > $r->log_reason("$am not OK");
> > }
> >
> > $r->note_basic_auth_failure;
> > return AUTH_REQUIRED;
> > }
> >
> > sub load {
> > my $module = @_;
> > $module =~ s[::][/]g;
> > $module .= '.pm';
> >
> > eval { require $module; };
> >
> > return $@ ? 1 : 0;
> > }
> >
> > 1;
> >
> > __END__
> >
> > (darren)
> >
> > --
> > Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by
> > incompetence.
> > -- Napolean Bonaparte
> --
> aaron ross . alias intelligence, inc
> email . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> phone . 215 545 6428
>
