Stas Bekman wrote: > What you are saying is that when the server is started afresh, the newly > started child processes share more memory with the parent, than newly > started child processes some time later. Am I correct?
Yes, exactly.
Stas Bekman wrote: > What you are saying is that when the server is started afresh, the newly > started child processes share more memory with the parent, than newly > started child processes some time later. Am I correct?
Yes, exactly.