Stas Bekman wrote: > Perrin Harkins wrote: > >> Stas Bekman wrote: >> >>> What you are saying is that when the server is started afresh, the >>> newly started child processes share more memory with the parent, than >>> newly started child processes some time later. Am I correct? >> >> >> Yes, exactly. > > > Any ideas why?
Not really. I thought maybe it was because of something changing in the parent process, but that doesn't seem possible. There was a long thread a little while back about turning swap off and on again to solve this. I've never tried that. I think restarting every 24 hours is a good idea anyway, because I've seen strange things happen now and then when a server is up for a long time. - Perrin
