We are investigating using IPC rather then a file based
structure but its purely investigation at this point.
What are the speed diffs between an IPC cache and a
Berkely DB cache. My gut instinct always screams 'Stay Off
The Disk' but my gut is not always right.. Ok, rarely
right.. ;)
John-
On Tue, 20 Aug 2002 11:49:52 -0500 (CDT)
Dave Rolsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Tue, 20 Aug 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Currently we are working on a 'per machine' cache so all
>> children can benefit for each childs initial database
>>read
>> of the translated string, the differential between
>> children is annoying in the 'per child cache' strategy.
>
>Sounds like you want BerkeleyDB.pm (not DB_File), which
>is quite fast and
>handles locking/concurrent access internally (when set up
>properly).
>
>See the Alzabo::ObjectCache::{Store,Sync}::BerkeleyDB
>modules for
>examples.
>
>For Alzabo, I also have a caching system that caches data
>in a database,
>for cross-machine caching/syncing. I haven't really
>benchmarked it yet
>but I imagine it could be a win in some situations. For
>example, you
>could set up the cache as a separate machine running
>MySQL and still pull
>your data from another machine, possibly running a
>different RDBMS.
>
>
>-dave
>
>/*==================
>www.urth.org
>we await the New Sun
>==================*/
>
