Geoffrey Young wrote:

As for Apache::TieBucketBrigade, it's probably a good idea to make it a
part of the mp2 core and implement it in C.


hey, you weren't quite as enthusiastic when I mentioned it ;)

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-modperl-dev&m=107514358415593&w=2

That's a totally different thing. What I said above is that it's probably not the most urgent thing to do, if we ever want to get 2.0 released. By commenting on Apache::TieBucketBrigade I was trying to reserve that or a similar namespace for the modperl core. So later there would be no collision/confusion.


__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman            JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/     mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org   http://ticketmaster.com

--
Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html



Reply via email to