Well, I only recently saw the top screencast on http://rubyonrails.org/screencasts (the blog in 58 lines of code thing) and was pretty impressed. The built in console, what appears to be really easy to use stuff (I'm a perl guy not a ruby guy so the ruby code looks pretty complex to me... ). Though from the looks of it and my recent look at Catalyst it looks comparable feature wise (MVC setup, scripts to create new displays or whatever).
It probably really comes down to personal preference and familiarity FWIW. On 2/24/06, Mark Galbreath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Better yet, ask your boss why s/he wants to use RoR. If it is more than > "because it's cool," enlighten us as well. > > mark > > >>> "Harry Zhu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 24-Feb-06 13:15:43 PM >>> > > > Can some body worked/studied on both world tell me the pros and cons about > these two? > > Our system was built on modperl, but the new boss intended to rebuilt it on > Ruby on Rail. How do we argue about it that perl/modperl have almost all the > features that Ruby has and more? > > > Harry Zhu -- Alan -=|=- http://arcterex.net If you think dogs can't count, try putting three dog biscuits in your pocket and then giving Fido only two of them. --Phil Pastoret
