ROR is quite nice if a substantial part of what you wnat is CRUD based on db schema. Also the AJAX tools look good. But i18n support is not looking too solid, though it may improve. This seems to be a problem with most frameworks though, and because of it I'm considering a total change of direction to plone in future.
I've heard that teh docs for Catalyst aren't all that. The ROR book is not bad.
Anyone used Maypole much?
On 24 Feb 2006 15:35:59 -0800, Randal L. Schwartz <merlyn@stonehenge.com> wrote:
>>>>> "Ryan" == Ryan Perry < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ryan> Ruby is cool because of it integration with _javascript_. But Ruby
Ryan> developers have told me that it doesn't scale well and you're better off
Ryan> with a different framework like HTML::Mason if you need something
Ryan> serious.
Catalyst has quite a bit of that JS integration completed already. Of all the
existing Perl frameworks, Catalyst is definitely the closest to RonR.
--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<merlyn@stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!
--
Daniel McBrearty
email : danielmcbrearty at gmail.com
www.engoi.com : the multi - language vocab trainer
BTW : 0873928131
