* On 2008-02-05 Philippe Bruhat (BooK) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 09:34:32AM +0100, Christian Bartolomaeus wrote: > > > > But apart from that, you are right: It should be easy to add > > algorithms for other (non chess) rating systems to my module -- and I > > would be interested in doing that. > > > > Therefore it would be good to find a more generic name than > > "Chess::Rating" (or "Chess::Rating::Calculate"). I'm just a bit > > chess-centric because I'm playing that game and not Go or others ;-) > > > > > Perhaps Statistics::Ratings::Elo? > > Or Games::Ratings::<rating name> ?
Sounds better to me than "Statistics::Ratings::<rating name>". I could even imagine to organize specific implementations like Games::Ratings::<game name>::<rating name> -> Games::Ratings::Chess::FIDE -> Games::Ratings::Chess::DWZ -> Games::Ratings::Go::EGF -> ... as "sub modules" under Games::Ratings. So I guess, I should just grab the name "Games::Ratings" for my stuff. Thanks for that suggestion. Best regards Christian
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
