Jerome Quelin writes: > - audio::mpd::common? (even if i don't think that's the best) > - audio::mpd::test? this one is already used by a module in audio::mpd, > but that's not a problem (i plan to move audio::mpd::test somewhere in > t/lib/, so namespace would be free) > - audio::mpd::testdata? > - audio::mpd::common::test? > - data::audio::mpd? > - data::audio::mpd::test? > - test::audio::mpd?
I'd go for the latter (well, with some capital letters!) cos people are used to the idea that Test:: modules are used for testing rather than being part of the 'main function' of your program. But none of those names sound bad -- they're all pretty self- explanatory, so any of them would do. Smylers
