Must be wearing the wrong Wellies!

Cheers,
Graham
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: e-mail colin.jones5857 
  To: mogtalk2 
  Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 7:16 AM
  Subject: Fwd: [mogtalk2] Miscellany


  Seems niot to have gone first time?  Apologies if you get this twice, working 
in a field!


  ---------- Forwarded message ----------
  From: e-mail colin.jones5857 <[email protected]>
  Date: 11 May 2012 07:08
  Subject: Re: [mogtalk2] Miscellany
  To: [email protected]



  Owen

  That's a rouge 'Multiple Misfire' code used on the GEMS system, ignore it.  
Its stored when the system detects a misfire (measured as a sudden change in 
rotational speed).  Tn Tops have a 'mass accelerometer' that measure he 
vertical movement of the vehicle (this bit is mega boring and most don't 
believe it anyway) imagine a rotating engine, pistons going up and down.....hit 
a bump and the piston speed relative to the block alters, the maths are 
boggling so car manufacturers fit these mass accelerometer (sometime on the 
bulkhead (Volvo) or sometimes part of the ECU (Bosch Motronic).

  Because of the way a Morgan likes to spend as much time in the air as on the 
ground the mass accelerometers (like the knock sensors) are not fitted.  This 
is ONE of the factors that cause the code to be stored.  A software fix was 
supposed to solve this but seemed not to, plus the system is so sensitive if it 
detects a reverse signal from the crankshaft sensor (engine running backwards) 
it stores the only code it can, a multiple misfire.....of course the engine 
does not run backwards but when you switch off if a cylinder is coming up to 
TDC on compression it has been known to kick back a few degrees and that's 
enough to trigger the code, this is ANOTHER reason for the rouge code.

  Finally the other well known one is the advanced EVAP system that is on the 
GEMS cars, it has a vent tank for the fuel tank and it is vented to the inlet 
manifold via a 'Purge Valve' which opens under certain conditions (normally 
just after engine warms up).  If you overfill the tank fuel bleeds into the 
vent tank, the purge valve opens and not only fumes but fuel is drawn into the 
inlet manifold/plenum chamber.  the system tries to adapt when the Lambda 
sensors see a rich mixture, cant as its outside of the adaptive window value 
max setting and so thinks there must be a misfire (plugs etc. not firing) so 
stores the only code its been given which is 'multiple misfire'.

  To say the factory is unaware of this is not exactly correct, maybe they have 
forgotten, I went to see Mark Baldwin (had an appointment) back in 2002 when I 
had this problem and traced it on my car, it was at the request of my 
Dealer....Mr. Baldwin failed to keep the appointment.  I then wrote a 3,000 
word test and rectification note for the MMC and sent it to the factory, 
nothing was ever sent to the dealers that I know of.  

  David Poole wrote the definitive guide to GEMS and several of us proof read 
it and suggested amendments and it really is the 'bible' for GEMS, again it was 
offered to MMC and the Dealerships and nothing was taken up so it sits on GOMOG 
for everyone to access.

  The information is out there Owen and its been tried to get it to the dealers.

  BR

  Colin


  On 10 May 2012 18:15, Owen Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote:

    Tim,
    I like the idea of what you are saying. I have a fault code 
reader/cancelling device. It cost a lot more than £30, but that's by the by. I 
bought it from Halford's. 'Nuff said.

    Now, to demonstrate to me that what you say is true, tell me what this 
fault code means: P.1316; and how I cure the fault. It's one I get often from 
my 4.0 litre, Land Rover V-8 powered, 2003 +8.

    If you can tell me, you can also tell the MMC - they don't know, nor do any 
of the dealers I've taken it to. Nor does the AA.

    I just cancel the code and carry on as before. Nothing seems to happen 
except that it occurs again, sooner or later.

    I gather Rover used to charge about £5 grand for their Testbook set-up. I'm 
not prepared to spend that on diagnostic equipment.

    Owen.



    ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Tim Harris 
      To: mogtalk2 
      Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 5:52 PM
      Subject: Re: [mogtalk2] Miscellany





      On 10 May 2012 10:33, Chas. <[email protected]> wrote:

         Of course on the technical front there is much less you can do at home 
with modern electronics than you could with points and tappets.



      Sadly, this myth has been well and truly sold to many people, who 
honestly believe that you can't work with modern cars at home.


      Routine servicing is much easier than it used to be, spark plugs only 
have to be changed once in a blue moon, tappets, never need attention, all you 
really have to do is change the oil and check the fluids - and yet strangely 
the costs we get charged by the dealer are vastly higher than ever they used to 
be.


      Cheapest entry point is 30 quid or so, which buys a code reader with 
which you can interpret any stored fault codes and clear them (a process which 
a dealer would charge 70 quid plus for). Plug the reader into the OBDII socket, 
download the codes, look up what they mean, fix the offending part. Perfect for 
identifying and cleaning or replacing a dirty MAF sensor or similar.


      If you want to spend a bit more money, then a couple of hundred quid on a 
laptop, a copy of the relevant software (e.g. Rovacom for a GEMS +8) and you 
can furtle to your heart's content, really getting to grips with what your 
engine's up to.


      If you want to get properly ambitious, then you can buy a complete 
replacement ECU from someone like Omex (who supply MMC), Emerald, or MBE, and 
completely remap and reprogram your entire performance envelope.


      And if you want to go completely OTT, you can even build you own engine 
management system from scratch with Megasquirt.


      I fully understand that messing about with one's engine is not everyone's 
cup of tea - and fair enough, I wouldn't try to convince anyone to do stuff 
they don't want to, but I would hate to think there are people out there who 
think 'I wish I could work on my modern Mog like I used to with my old one".


      It's a different set of skills, sure, but certainly not beyond an average 
enthusiast mechanic. I reckon that adjusting one's fuelling map with a laptop 
is a heck of a lot more straightforward than trying to understand the 
complexities of twin DCOEs.


      Tim
    View posts on The Mail Archive 
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

          Modify Your Subscription  





  View posts on The Mail Archive 
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

        Modify Your Subscription  



-------------------------------------------
View posts on The Mail Archive
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ 
[http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/]

Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=22459785&id_secret=22459785-4a39ddf8
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to