Hello Sean

Begging your indulgence.  Could you please clarify a couple of point?

1.  "While the one-sheets and three-sheets are linenbacked, all the smaller 
sizes (halves, inserts, and lobbies) are NOT paperbacked - though they are all 
restored"

'FAKES BEING RESTORED' , just doesn't sound right.  Is that really the best way 
to describe what is being done?

2. If Window Cards can have their back layer removed during restoration, and 
re-mounted on acid free card stock, and if S2 Art prints can be sanded down to 
paper thickness, and then paperbacked or linenbacked, then why couldn't a fake 
lobby card be produced by using paperbacking?

Zeev

 
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Sean Linkenback 
  To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU 
  Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 3:29 PM
  Subject: Re: [MOPO] Where to send Universal material to authenticate?


  Steve,
  I don't know where or how you understood that all the fakes are supposedly 
paperbacked, but nothing could be further from the truth.  While the one-sheets 
and three-sheets are linenbacked, all the smaller sizes (halves, inserts, and 
lobbies) are NOT paperbacked - though they are all restored.
  Abbott & Costello Meet Frankenstein itself as a title is not out of the 
clear, as I have seen a fake Title Card on this film in person. I have not seen 
any scene card as of yet, but that doesn't mean anything one way or the other.  
  If the restorer who made these ever decides to make a list of the titles he 
made and the quantities it would certainly help in removing the fakes from the 
market and easing the fears of collectors like yourself.
  Of course it is certainly possible that a card can be 60+ years old and still 
be as fresh as the day it was produced.  Look at some of the beautiful lobby 
sets Todd is offering for sale as an example.  I myself have even had near 
perfect mint cards from Cabinet of Dr. Caligari, and those lobbies are nearly 
90 years old.
  The main question is - how good do you feel about your ability to spot 
restoration?  If you have a good eye for restoration and your lobby appears to 
be completely unrestored, then it is most likely original.

  Sean


    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Steven F. Poole 
    To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU 
    Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 2:42 PM
    Subject: [MOPO] Where to send Universal material to authenticate?


    Hi all-
      A month or so ago, after the whole Universal horror scam scandal broke, I 
contacted Profiles regarding a lot that I had purchased in their spring 
auction.   It is a 1948 lobby card for ABBOTT AND COSTELLO MEET FRANKENSTEIN 
and is the card of the boys discovering the Monster in the packing crate (my 
favorite card from the set).   
       Naturally, I had a knee-jerk reaction to the fakes issue and checked the 
card out again closely.   It is presents as near mint with no backing.  I began 
to wonder about something that is supposeded to be 60+ years old and is, for 
lack of a better term, as "minty white" as could possiblyh be.  I did not know 
at the time  the scandal first broke that the alleged fakes are all apparently 
paper backed.   I called Profiles and met with a rather dismissive response 
that the "reproductionists" would not possibly have bothered with such a 
low-end card (although it hammered at almost $1000, including the premium which 
is just about where this card sells retail).   At the time, I was somewhat 
reassured although felt as though the person I spoke with apparently 
representing Profiles on this issue really considered my card a small fish in 
their large pond and it was not worth pursuing any kind of authentication.
        The Profiles rep. did say that if I  still had a doubt, I could send it 
to Poster Mountain to have it proclaimed authentic.
         My question is, would a card like this have been indeed not  been , 
for the alleged scammers, "worth their while" to fake?   Also, I have not 
really relished the idea of speaking with Profiles again but was wondering if  
they are still utilizing Poster Mountain for authentication or using another 
source if I wanted it checked out.
          Thanks in advance for any direction.

          Steve
    Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
    ___________________________________________________________________
    How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
    Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
    In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

  Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___________________________________________________________________
  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
  In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
  The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to