Rich-
   Are they just a bit thicker than what seems normal?
   Steve
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Richard Halegua Comic Art & Movie Posters 
  To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU 
  Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 5:29 PM
  Subject: Re: [MOPO] Where to send Universal material to authenticate?


  Zeev

  the smaller sizes consisted of real posters - lc's, wc's, hs's, inserts - 
that had the front sanded down to remove the image
  then an inkjet or other copy was mounted to the front (sanded side)
  then each item was carefully restored to give it the appearance of an 
authentic card that was restored, thereby misdirecting your attention from the 
forgery

  Rich


  At 03:14 PM 10/6/2009, lobby card invasion wrote:

    Hello Sean
     
    Begging your indulgence.  Could you please clarify a couple of point?
     
    1.  "While the one-sheets and three-sheets are linenbacked, all the smaller 
sizes (halves, inserts, and lobbies) are NOT paperbacked - though they are all 
restored"
     
    'FAKES BEING RESTORED' , just doesn't sound right.  Is that really the best 
way to describe what is being done?
     
    2. If Window Cards can have their back layer removed during restoration, 
and re-mounted on acid free card stock, and if S2 Art prints can be sanded down 
to paper thickness, and then paperbacked or linenbacked, then why couldn't a 
fake lobby card be produced by using paperbacking?
     
    Zeev
     
     

      ----- Original Message ----- 

      From: Sean Linkenback 

      To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU 

      Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 3:29 PM

      Subject: Re: [MOPO] Where to send Universal material to authenticate?


      Steve,

      I don't know where or how you understood that all the fakes are 
supposedly paperbacked, but nothing could be further from the truth.  While the 
one-sheets and three-sheets are linenbacked, all the smaller sizes (halves, 
inserts, and lobbies) are NOT paperbacked - though they are all restored.

      Abbott & Costello Meet Frankenstein itself as a title is not out of the 
clear, as I have seen a fake Title Card on this film in person. I have not seen 
any scene card as of yet, but that doesn't mean anything one way or the other.  

      If the restorer who made these ever decides to make a list of the titles 
he made and the quantities it would certainly help in removing the fakes from 
the market and easing the fears of collectors like yourself.

      Of course it is certainly possible that a card can be 60+ years old and 
still be as fresh as the day it was produced.  Look at some of the beautiful 
lobby sets Todd is offering for sale as an example.  I myself have even had 
near perfect mint cards from Cabinet of Dr. Caligari, and those lobbies are 
nearly 90 years old.

      The main question is - how good do you feel about your ability to spot 
restoration?  If you have a good eye for restoration and your lobby appears to 
be completely unrestored, then it is most likely original.



      Sean





        ----- Original Message ----- 

        From: Steven F. Poole 

        To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU 

        Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 2:42 PM

        Subject: [MOPO] Where to send Universal material to authenticate?


        Hi all-

          A month or so ago, after the whole Universal horror scam scandal 
broke, I contacted Profiles regarding a lot that I had purchased in their 
spring auction.   It is a 1948 lobby card for ABBOTT AND COSTELLO MEET 
FRANKENSTEIN and is the card of the boys discovering the Monster in the packing 
crate (my favorite card from the set).   

           Naturally, I had a knee-jerk reaction to the fakes issue and checked 
the card out again closely.   It is presents as near mint with no backing.  I 
began to wonder about something that is supposeded to be 60+ years old and is, 
for lack of a better term, as "minty white" as could possiblyh be.  I did not 
know at the time  the scandal first broke that the alleged fakes are all 
apparently paper backed.   I called Profiles and met with a rather dismissive 
response that the "reproductionists" would not possibly have bothered with such 
a low-end card (although it hammered at almost $1000, including the premium 
which is just about where this card sells retail).   At the time, I was 
somewhat reassured although felt as though the person I spoke with apparently 
representing Profiles on this issue really considered my card a small fish in 
their large pond and it was not worth pursuing any kind of authentication.

            The Profiles rep. did say that if I  still had a doubt, I could 
send it to Poster Mountain to have it proclaimed authentic.

             My question is, would a card like this have been indeed not  been 
, for the alleged scammers, "worth their while" to fake?   Also, I have not 
really relished the idea of speaking with Profiles again but was wondering if  
they are still utilizing Poster Mountain for authentication or using another 
source if I wanted it checked out.

              Thanks in advance for any direction.



              Steve

        Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com

        ___________________________________________________________________

        How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

        Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

        In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

        The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.



      Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com

      ___________________________________________________________________

      How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

      Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

      In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

      The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.



    Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
    ___________________________________________________________________
    How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
    Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
    In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

  Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___________________________________________________________________
  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
  In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
  The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.



------------------------------------------------------------------------------



  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
  Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.14.4/2416 - Release Date: 10/05/09 
18:23:00

         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to