> > Can and > should we make a wider effort to facilitate the reproduction of systems > by disseminating settings or configuration files? This dissemination is > partially done by system description papers, but they cannot cover all > settings [this would make for a very boring paper]. I put some effort > into documenting my WMT submission by releasing EMS configuration files > ( https://github.com/rsennrich/wmt2014-scripts/tree/master/example ), > and I would be happy to see this done more often. >
Compare with speech recognition, where the major open source toolkit is Kaldi. One of its stated goals is to collect a set of recipes for reproducing state-of-the-art results. http://kaldi.sourceforge.net/about.html I don't know how well they've succeeded at this. But it's an admirable goal.
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
_______________________________________________ Moses-support mailing list Moses-support@mit.edu http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
