In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter Lairo says...
>
>my oppinion of you just took a 180 - you are obviously a slimeball.
>
What'd you think of me before?
>You're either being paid by Microsoft
Yeah that's the first time I've been accused of that by a religious zealot.
> or just an *a..hole* (I suspect
>both).
Or that.
> Either way, your behaviour and actions are reprehensible.
>
Posting a link of where to get IE6.0 is "reprehensible"? Explain. Why don't
you want people to know where to get it?
>You're obviously not going to go away on your own, so I hope you get ill
>and can't use a PC for a long time.
>
So let me get this straight: You wish me disabling ill-health because I posted a
link to IE6.0.
And you have the nerve to call me a "reprehensible" "slimeball".
>
>JTK wrote:
>
>> It seems that people (including me) are having problems finding where they can
>> get the new IE6.0 beta, which MS of course confusingly is calling a "Refresh".
>> On some machines it shows up in "Windows Update", on some it doesn't, etc.
>> Here's an almost-direct link to download page:
>>
>> http://www.micxxxft.com/windows/ie/downxload/prxeviecw/ieb6/betnanote.asp
>>
>> It is available for all Windows platforms back to Win98.
>>
>>
>
>
>--
>
>Regards,
>
>Peter Lairo
>
--
JTK
"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom, must, like men, undergo the
fatigues of supporting it." - Thomas Paine
