And it came to pass that Netscape Basher wrote: > Jonas Jørgensen typed: >> blackbox wrote: >> >>> ¿What make them qualify to be categorized and be named >>> 'standards'? >> >> >> If they are accepted by a recognized, trustworthy, >> independent, standard-defining organization. For instance: >> >> Internet Engineering Task Force Request For Comments: >> http://www.ietf.org/rfc >> >> World Wide Webconsortium Recommendations: >> http://www.w3.org/TR/#Recommendations >> >> /Jonas >> > > Which Netscape only started to care about when they became > the minority in the browser market, then they started to > cry foul. > > It is MS Explorer that defines the standards used, not the > w3c. The w3c means nothing. > > >
It's a shame that most of the rest of the world disagrees. AT&T no longer supports FrontPage extensions, opting instead for w3c compliance. -- }:-) Christopher Jahn {:-( Dionysian Reveler All men are created unequal. To reply: xjahnATyahooDOTcom