Christopher Jahn typed: > And it came to pass that blackbox wrote: > > >> >>"Jonas Jørgensen" wrote >> >>>If they are accepted by a recognized, trustworthy, >>>independent, standard-defining organization. For instance: >>> >>>Internet Engineering Task Force Request For Comments: >>>http://www.ietf.org/rfc >>> >>>World Wide Webconsortium Recommendations: >>>http://www.w3.org/TR/#Recommendations >>> >> >> what makes them has that recognition, be trustworthy, >> and be able to >>define an standard? > > > This group was established to create the World Wide Web in the > first place. They did it by defining the standards that would > allow software to be created that could use the standards to > browse the internet. Without the standards set up by the W3c in > the first place, there could be no WWW.
False. It would of formed. No one group can claim to have founded the world wide web. > > This is why they are the recognized international organization > that sets the standards for the WWW. Wrong. They are one of many groups that makes this claim. It is interesting that the mozilla.org site is non-w3c compliant. When it is, let me know. > > >>I have visited those sites many times, and i still have not >>found when, where, how and why the standard was born. > > > Look at the creation date of the Consortium. The w3c is irrelvant. Nothing but pro-Linux, MS hating folks. > > -- Kyle "It is possible to store the mind with a million facts and still be entirely uneducated" - Alec Bourne
