Frank Klemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I've been doing some tests on the accuracy of decoder implementations. > > A full quality-optimized decoder will always fail the test. > > The "round to the nearest integer" is the worst thing you can do. I don't understand. What are you talking about? Many quality decoders (e.g. mpg123) pass the test without trouble. Who is rounding what to the nearest integer? -- Rob Leslie [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
- [MP3 ENCODER] MPEG audio decoder compliance Rob Leslie
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MPEG audio decoder compliance Roel VdB
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MPEG audio decoder compliance Rob Leslie
- Re[2]: [MP3 ENCODER] MPEG audio decoder comp... Roel VdB
- Re: Re[2]: [MP3 ENCODER] MPEG audio deco... Gabriel Bouvigne
- Re[4]: [MP3 ENCODER] MPEG audio dec... Roel VdB
- [MP3 ENCODER] MPEG audio decoder co... Frank Klemm
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MPEG audio de... Rob Leslie
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MPEG audi... Frank Klemm
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MPEG audi... Rob Leslie
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MPEG audi... Frank Klemm
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MPEG audi... Rob Leslie
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MPEG audi... Frank Klemm
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MPEG audi... Robert Hegemann
- RE: [MP3 ENCODER] MPEG audi... alex . broadhead
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] attitude Gabriel Bouvigne
- Re: Re[2]: [MP3 ENCODER] MPEG audio deco... Rob Leslie
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MPEG audio decode... David Balazic