I think SkyNet/eno is a Core 2. It would be interesting to see what score one obtains on a slower Core 2 machine to test the idea that these scores scale linearly with clock speed.
At the moment it looks like we'd be about 10% behind GMP 4.3 if the benchmarks do scale linearly. Bill. 2009/2/23 <ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com>: > > > I've done the merge , it is only marginally faster than before ,probably > because there were not many inc/dec's , and there is probably a still a fair > amount of slack in the functions. > I got a bench of 10364 on sage.math > > > > On Sunday 22 February 2009 22:34:11 Jason Martin wrote: >> Sounds fine. >> >> Jason Worth Martin >> Asst. Professor of Mathematics >> http://www.math.jmu.edu/~martin >> >> On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 2:49 PM, <ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com> wrote: >> > If there are no objections , I will merge the core-2 branch into trunk >> > tomorrow. All I have changed are inc/dec to add/sub . >> > I didn't do it for mpn-divexact_byff or the sub,add part of redc_basecase >> > because it was not trivial. >> > >> > When I say a merge I will just copy the new files across , as there is >> > some testing code in the core-2 branch, which we dont want. >> > >> > Jason >> >> > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
