On Monday 23 February 2009 12:12:59 Bill Hart wrote: > I think SkyNet/eno is a Core 2. It would be interesting to see what > score one obtains on a slower Core 2 machine to test the idea that > these scores scale linearly with clock speed. > > At the moment it looks like we'd be about 10% behind GMP 4.3 if the > benchmarks do scale linearly. > > Bill. > > 2009/2/23 <ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com>: > > I've done the merge , it is only marginally faster than before ,probably > > because there were not many inc/dec's , and there is probably a still a > > fair amount of slack in the functions. > > I got a bench of 10364 on sage.math > > > > On Sunday 22 February 2009 22:34:11 Jason Martin wrote: > >> Sounds fine. > >> > >> Jason Worth Martin > >> Asst. Professor of Mathematics > >> http://www.math.jmu.edu/~martin > >> > >> On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 2:49 PM, <ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com> wrote: > >> > If there are no objections , I will merge the core-2 branch into trunk > >> > tomorrow. All I have changed are inc/dec to add/sub . > >> > I didn't do it for mpn-divexact_byff or the sub,add part of > >> > redc_basecase because it was not trivial. > >> > > >> > When I say a merge I will just copy the new files across , as there > >> > is some testing code in the core-2 branch, which we dont want. > >> > > >> > Jason > >
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
