On Wednesday 04 March 2009 15:40:04 Bill Hart wrote: > This is on a K10. The runs differ significantly. Interesting. > > It might have to do with the almost completely unpredictable > scheduling on the K10. Certainly the differences at limb n are almost > always made up again, or nearly so, at limb n+1, and by the end of 40 > limbs the times are usually within a cycle or so. On average > performance doesn't vary. > > Bill.
My K8 is very stable, the K10(cuda1) a bit less so , and I found the core2 (sage.math) to be all over the place . You could try increasing the precision , yet again. > > 2009/3/4 Jeff Gilchrist <jeff.gilchr...@gmail.com>: > > On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Bill Hart <goodwillh...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> I've just noticed that the times from speed are not consistent between > >> runs!! I thought that was almost impossible. > > > > I did several runs on my systems and they all agreed for me, even when > > the system was loaded or not. > > > > Jeff. > > - Show quoted text - > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
