On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 2:55 AM, Cactus <rieman...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I am really grateful for your efforts on this. It has clearly cost > you a lot of time but I assure you it is really appreciated. My pleasure, I'm glad I can finally do something to help. > I am now updating the graphs and it seems that mpn_add_n is odd on > Windows. As it happens I am worrying about this already so I will > hopefully be able to track it down > > I will update the mpn_add_n graph now and the others later. Sorry I didn't catch this earlier but you seem to have my Q9550 Vista results in there twice. In your mpn_add_n.pdf for example you have an orange Q9550 Core 2 (3.40), a dashed Q9550 Core 2 (4x2.83) V, and a dashed Q9550 Core 2 (4x2.83) L. The Q9550 Core 2 (3.40) and Q9550 Core 2 (4x2.83) V are in fact the same results so you can delete the orange set if you ever update those graphs again, and the 4x2.83 in both V and L should be 4x3.40. For some reason cpuinfo reports the original clock speed of the CPU and not what it is currently running at. Jeff. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
