On May 25, 4:27 pm, Bill Hart <goodwillh...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Do we really need logops.c and logops_n.c. Should we do some kind of
> rationalisation?

I am open to suggestions :-)

I don't know how to get logops_n.c working on its own - I assume that
it needs another file that includes it repeatedly with the various
OPERATION_??? defines set to specialise it.

I could have written logops.c this way but it was more bother than it
was worth.

    Brian

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"mpir-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to mpir-de...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.

Reply via email to