On Thursday 18 November 2010 22:05:30 Bill Hart wrote: > I used google to find a list. By that I mean I googled: > > family 6, model x > > for various x to see if they existed. >
Good idea , but it's not surprising how many advertisers get it wrong,,, , but as long as we have an concrete(silicon) example. > Some guy has some links to some sources of info here: > > http://wbhart.blogspot.com/2010/09/bsdnt-configure-and-assembly.html > > :-) Let's hope he knows what he's talking about :) > > The chip below is a server. It's a new AMD Magny Cours chip (12 core). > The other one I listed is a i5 (nehalem) laptop. > this is and i5 or i3 which can be a nehalem or westmere , but as it's a mobile chip it should be a westmere (ie with AES and carry-less multiplication , and pehaps? different timings/latency's) , makes no difference at the moment but we may want to in the future? > Bill. > > On 18 November 2010 21:57, Jason <ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com> wrote: > > Cheers , out of curiosity is this a server chip ? I assume it is a > > nehalem and not a westmere (ie 32nm instead of 45nm and with the new AES > > instructions) > > > > can you do a uname -a and a cat /proc/cpu for me > > > > Again another undocumented model number , I'm going to see if I can find > > a updated list or something. > > > > Thanks > > Jason > > > > On Thursday 18 November 2010 21:04:56 Bill Hart wrote: > >> Another machine not recognised by cpuid.c: > >> > >> $ diff ../cpuid.old cpuid.c > >> 86a87 > >> > >> > if (model == 37){ CPUIS(nehalem);break;} > >> > >> Bill. > >> > >> On 18 November 2010 21:02, Bill Hart <goodwillh...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> > That error message usually comes up when linking against a library > >> > which is static when it should be linking against a shared library, or > >> > something like that. > >> > > >> > I don't really know how to debug that. But Jason has been working on > >> > the fat build system, so hopefully can guess. > >> > > >> > Bill. > >> > > >> > On 18 November 2010 20:41, Jeff Gilchrist <jeff.gilchr...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Bill Hart > >> >> <goodwillh...@googlemail.com> > > > > wrote: > >> >>> $ diff cpuid.old cpuid.c > >> >>> 124c124,125 > >> >>> < break; > >> >>> --- > >> >>> > >> >>>> if (model == 9) { CPUIS(k102);break;} > >> >>>> break; > >> >>> > >> >>> Otherwise tests pass with only the following warnings when doing > >> >>> make > > > > check: > >> >> I just tried from a new tar ball and I get the same make error. This > >> >> error isn't happening during make check, it is during make. What > >> >> info would be useful to help debug this? > >> >> > >> >> Jeff. > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >> >> Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to > >> >> mpir-de...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send > >> >> email to mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, > >> >> visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en. > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to > > mpir-de...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email > > to mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this > > group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to mpir-de...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.
