On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Jason <ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com> wrote:
> I'm assuming case 3 is on the same machine as the failed case ? Yes, they are the same machine. > Did the previous mpir v2.1 fail with the same options ? I just checked an v2.1.3 also fails with the same options enabled > Can you try it without the --enable-assert to see if it's some old assertion > getting in the way , and also perhaps without --enable-cxx to see if it's the > c++ being a problem. The machine works fine with just --enable-cxx, I also tried with just --enable-fat and I get the failure so it seems to be a fat thing. > Do you have another compiler on that system to try ? , in case it is that > particular compiler setup. The only other compiler on the system is pathscale which is a variant of gcc and gives the same error. > You could try replacing mpn/x86_64/fat/fat_entry.asm with the version from > mpir v2.1 , as the file has changed , but only a little bit ! Since the compile error is happening with 2.1, I figure there isn't much point in trying this. Jeff. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to mpir-de...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.
