That same set of options with gcc 4.4.3 works fine on my x86_64 linux machine. Jeff's gcc is very old. Don't know if that's significant though. It technically should build.
Bill. On 18 November 2010 22:29, Jason <ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com> wrote: > On Thursday 18 November 2010 20:17:03 Jeff Gilchrist wrote: >> Some rc2 tests. Here are the ones that passed: >> >> 1. Intel Xeon X5550 running Linux 64bit >> ./config.guess = nehalem-unknown-linux-gnu >> ICC v11.0 with --enable-cxx = All tests passed >> ICC v11.0 with --enable-cxx --enable-assert --enable-fat = All tests passed >> GCC v4.1.2 with --enable-cxx = All tests passed >> GCC v4.1.2 with --enable-cxx --enable-assert --enable-fat = All tests >> passed >> >> 2. Intel Xeon E5405 running Linux 64bit >> ./config.guess = penryn-unknown-linux-gnu >> ICC v11.0 with --enable-cxx = All tests passed >> ICC v11.0 with --enable-cxx --enable-assert --enable-fat = All tests passed >> GCC v4.1.2 with --enable-cxx = All tests passed >> GCC v4.1.2 with --enable-cxx --enable-assert --enable-fat = All tests >> passed >> >> 3. AMD Opteron 248 running Linux 64bit >> ./config.guess = k8-unknown-linux-gnu >> GCC 3.4.6 with --enable-cxx = All tests passed >> >> 4. Intel Core2 running cygwin32 (older version of cygwin) >> ./config.guess = core2-pc-cygwin >> GCC 3.4.4 with --enable-cxx = All tests passed >> >> 5. Intel Core2 running Windows Vista 32bit >> MS Visual Studio 2008 Express (pentium4 32bit project) = All tests passed >> >> >> Here is the one that failed: >> >> 1. AMD Opteron 248 running Linux 64bit >> ./config.guess = k8-unknown-linux-gnu >> GCC 3.4.6 with --enable-cxx --enable-assert --enable-fat = FAIL >> /usr/bin/ld: mpn/.libs/fat_entry.o: relocation R_X86_64_32S against >> `_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_' can not be used when making a shared object; >> recompile with -fPIC >> mpn/.libs/fat_entry.o: could not read symbols: Bad value >> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status >> make[2]: *** [libmpir.la] Error 1 > > > I'm assuming case 3 is on the same machine as the failed case ? > > Did the previous mpir v2.1 fail with the same options ? > > Can you try it without the --enable-assert to see if it's some old assertion > getting in the way , and also perhaps without --enable-cxx to see if it's the > c++ being a problem. > Do you have another compiler on that system to try ? , in case it is that > particular compiler setup. > > You could try replacing mpn/x86_64/fat/fat_entry.asm with the version from > mpir v2.1 , as the file has changed , but only a little bit ! > > > Thanks > Jason > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "mpir-devel" group. > To post to this group, send email to mpir-de...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to mpir-de...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.
