Sat, 9 Jun 2012 20:00:37 +0100 Jason Moxham <ja...@thecodecavern.co.uk> wrote:
> I had a quick read of the license and it's nothing special , so > mingw64 users probably wont have an objection , but I can imagine > other (linux users for example)people who will object to downloading > a package which contains some parts which have a "commercial" license > even though they won't be using it in anyway. We can solve this by > using are automated "make dist" system to build two varients , one > pure open source version for all system except mingw64 , and a > mingw64 version which contains jwasm. I don't intend to move away from YASM anytime soon as there are more important things to do - completing the new FFT and the adoption of the types that allow default 64-bit integers in Windows. Brian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Yeah I agree , it's a future option Jason -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.
