That sounds like it might be a good plan. But I do want to make sure I can build MPIR on MinGW64 without MASM, as I currently don't seem to have a copy and there are no free alternatives (though the Yasm format isn't that dissimilar, as you say).
Bill. On 9 June 2012 17:53, Jason Moxham <ja...@thecodecavern.co.uk> wrote: > What I'm saying that if msvc wants to go the masm route then I'm sure I can > get mingw64 to work with those source files , we would of course need the > path in mingw64 to specify where masm was , or perhaps if we keep the masm > macros simple (like we do anyway) then even the current mingw64 yasm will > build them anyway > > Jason > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "mpir-devel" group. > To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.
